Copied from another site. Sounds about right.

Random person: “Wear your damn mask”

Me: The viral particles are much smaller than the pores of the mask, so the mask is ineffective at filtering them. Right?

R: No, they travel on droplets and the masks keep the droplets out. Or they keep them in if you’re sick.

M: So wait, how is the virus transmitted?

R: Through droplets. Wear the mask.

M: Droplets?

R: Yes, like droplets spewed through a cough or sneeze.

M: So through people who are showing symptoms?

R: Yes

M: So why do healthy people need to wear masks?

R: Because of asymptomatic spread. Listen to the experts.

M: I am listening to the experts. Many studies show, and even the WHO announced, that asymptomatic transmission is exceedingly rare. Did you read that?

R: WHO walked that back to clarify that its presymptomatic spread that’s concerning.

M: Presymptomatic?

R: Yes, like they are infected but showing no symptoms.

M: Symptoms like coughing or sneezing?

R: Yes.

M: So how is the virus spread again?

R: Just wear the mask.

M: Are you going to answer the question?

R: It’s like pants.

M: Pants?

R: If a person pees in public without pants on, you have a greater chance of getting pee on you. Your risk is reduced further if you are wearing pants too.

M: First of all, people don’t pee in public. Second, if they did pee in public, the only way someone’s stream of urine would hit me is if they were directly aiming for me and standing close enough to hit me. And third, I don’t care if you wear pants. How does this relate?

R: If someone coughs on you in public you’ll care.

M: People don’t just cough on each other. The last time someone coughed directly in my face was when I had toddlers and they didn’t understand common courtesy and germ transmission. The only way someone would cough directly on me in public is if they were aiming. Anyway pants don’t keep the pee in, it’s still going to get everywhere. Pants just change the direction of the flow. Same with masks.

R: Common courtesy?! You don’t have common courtesy if you’re refusing to do something as simple as wearing a mask!

M: How is it courteous to ask me to do something I disagree with (based on research) especially when I’m not sick or showing any symptoms when the virus is spread through the droplets of people who are showing symptoms?

R: You’ll think differently if you get sick.

M: If I get sick, I’ll stay home. But if I must go out I will be happy to not cough on people. But just to clarify, would you stand near me in public if I were wearing a mask and coughing?

R: No, I mean, if you get sick, you could die.

M: The virus has a 99.9 something percent survival rate.

R: It’s not about you, it’s about protecting the vulnerable.

M: If I am not sick or showing symptoms how am I further protecting the vulnerable by wearing a mask? Studies also show these masks put the wearer at increased risk of illness.

R: You can’t listen to those studies, you need to listen to professionals in the fields of medicine and science.

M: These studies ARE from professionals in the fields of medicine and science.

R: They are obviously flawed.

M: How so?

R: It wouldn’t be a mandate if it weren’t important.

M: Why is it a mandate now that the death rate has plummeted when it wasn’t a mandate during the peak?

R: Because of new studies on masks.

M: So masks have never been studied before, in the entire history of medicine?

R: It’s a new virus.

M: A new virus that is transmitted in the same way as other viruses. How is it transmitted again? Through droplets of people showing symptoms? So, if I’m not sick or showing symptoms and I have no fever and I’m not coughing, how would my wearing a mask further prevent transmission?

R: Stop being an asshole and wear the mask.

M: So, you’re asking that I stop thinking critically, accept a fascist mandate, join the herd, and walk blindly into a dangerous abyss of ever increasing control over my self sovereignty, all while signaling my virtue?

R: I’ll report you if you don’t.

M: What country am I in again?

“My contention is that good men (not bad men) consistently acting upon that position [imposing “the good”] would act as cruelly and unjustly as the greatest tyrants. They might in some respects act even worse. Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under of robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber barons cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some points be satiated; but those who torment us for their own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to heaven yet at the same time likely to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be “cured” against one’s will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on the level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”

C. S. Lewis

Start here:

http://discoverthenetworks.com/

Written by somebody else:
“Carnegie transformed steel from a scarce semi-precious metal of variable poor quality to a cheap and plentiful commodity of high quality and selectable and predictable properties. This metal became the very bones of civilization.

He did so in the span of one productive lifetime.

Rockefeller saved the whales, by making “Coal oil” (Kerosene) for our lamps, so cheap and consistent and impurity-free (standard) as to make it relatively safe and easily affordable to use widely, allowing folks anywhere to see as they wanted without the sun. This also happened to end the market for whale oil, saving those magnificent creatures. The wildly and near-explosively inflammable contaminant removed from lamp oil, “petroleum distillates”, became gasoline to power motors, and thus to create a revolution in sanitation: no more poop/whizz filled streets and resultant disease. Other useful stuff came out of the refining process, to pave streets, lubricate machines, and seal roofs. The invention of petroleum pipelines made it safe to move massive quantities of combustible products around, safely and predictably. Oil thus powered, illuminated, and lubricated civilization.

Again, in the span of one productive lifetime.”

A little something from one of my shooting buddies for the Woke Folk to consider…

But they’re not allowed to read it.

====
A thought. With the exception of Salt Lake City and Honolulu, no American urban area has more than three days worth of food. Salt Lake City because it’s full of Mormons, whose religion requires a year’s worth of food and medicine to be stocked at any time (who says the religious can’t be practical), and Honolulu, because it’s often isolated by storms for a week or two at a time.

Bullet point: The primary cultural difference in America isn’t Democrat vs. Republican, socialist vs. capitalist, or “liberal” vs. conservative. Look at a map of any recent Presidential election BY COUNTY, and you’ll see that our great divide is between major cities and the remainder of the country. Other than mostly unpopulated Indian reservations, the Democratic Party can’t win an election more than an hour’s drive from the downtown area of a major city.

Farmers, fishermen, and ranchers are virtually all traditional Americans, what is nowadays labelled an
“extreme” conservative. The same for the truckers and train crews that bring the food to the cities. Plus the oil drillers and refinery workers, lumberjacks, saw mill workers, plumbers, carpenters, electricians, police, and military that keep the urban “elite” fed, safe, and pampered.

Those major urban areas don’t manufacture anything anymore. What physical wealth they have is as “through-puts”, shipping ports for goods produced elsewhere, passing through from the world to America, or from America to the world. The new, larger Panama Canal makes the west coast far less important to this country than it was before, and the shipping ports of the deep south are rapidly becoming the new central hub of the United States.

The old tired cities of the liberal coasts have office space that could more easily and cheaply be in Des Moines or Tuscaloosa, major elitist universities that arguably are a drag on our nation rather than a plus, and generally rather authoritarian governments that resemble failing socialist Western Europe far more than they do anything native to America.

Anti business regimes, brutally high taxes, a smug, self-righteous sense of (unwarranted) superiority, and rampant crime compared to middle America, all have combined to make the big cities, particularly on the coasts and Great Lakes, places that are so far removed from the American heartland that they are foreign and hostile cancers that threaten the existence of our country and culture.

What is there to do about this unfortunate situation? What perfectly legal and non-violent way is there for Main Street America to stick it to a culturally unassimilated collection of parasitic sociopaths who insist that only they can run America?

Return to the observation at the beginning of my rant, the bit about almost no cities having more than three days food, along with water and electricity piped or cabled in from hundreds or thousands of miles away in “fly-over” country.

What if conservative America just took a week off, went on an unscheduled vacation? Picture New York City or Los Angeles with no food or police for a week, without anybody to fix the plumbing or electricity, nobody to fight fires?

The Democratic Party maintains power by having a huge number of serfs completely dependent on it, either as multi-generational welfare recipients or bureaucrats. These people are clustered overwhelmingly in urban areas, where they are farmed for their votes.

What happens when the food stops, when the gas stations are empty and the buses stop running? What will that violent professional underclass do to the people, the culture, that created them and maintained them in their state of helplessness?

Another bullet point, the primary one: The American left exists only at the sufferance of the American right. They literally couldn’t wipe their bottoms without us. Even sporadic, partial boycotts of goods and services would throw the cities into a tailspin.

It could only result in greater leverage for the producers who enable the entire culture.